Judges Opinions Public Notices, — September 2, 2020 12:34 — 0 Comments
Public Notices, September 2, 2020
Volume 58, No. 5
PUBLIC NOTICES
DECEDENTS’ ESTATES
PETITION FOR LEAVE OF COURT
ORPHANS’ COURT DIVISION NOTICE
TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Ray Simon v. Dennis Herman, et al., and Benny Torres, et al.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Letters Testamentary or of Administration have been granted in the following estates. All persons indebted to the said estate are required to make payment, and those having claims or demands to present the same without delay to the administrators or executors named.
FIRST PUBLICATION
ESTATE OF NANCY H. ORSINI, late of South Londonderry Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executor.
Michael A. Orsini, Executor
Edward P. Seeber, Esquire
JSDC Law Offices
Suite C-400
555 Gettysburg Pike
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
ESTATE OF GENEVA M. KNARR A/K/A GENEVA MARILLA KNARR, late of Myerstown, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executrix.
Lisa Allwein, Executrix
Megan C. Huff, Esquire
Nestico Druby, P.C.
1135 East Chocolate Avenue
Suite 300
Hershey, PA 17033
ESTATE OF LOUISE ALICE TRUMP A/K/A LOUISE A. TRUMP, late of Cornwall Borough, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executor.
Karen L. Trump, Executor
1509 Turnpike Road
Elizabethtown, PA 17022
John D. Enck, Esquire
Spitler, Kilgore & Enck, PC
522 South 8th Street
Lebanon, PA 17042
ESTATE OF RUTH A. COLEMAN, late of Annville, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executrix.
Geraldine E. Barringer, Executrix
70 North Heidelberg Road
Robesonia, PA 19551
Sean J. O’Brien, Esquire
534 Court Street
Reading, PA 19601
ESTATE OF EDNA G. BROWER, late of the Township of Jackson, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executors.
Joyce A. Dresch, Executor
1033 School House Road
Annville, PA 17003
Eric M. Brower, Executor
18 Pennsylvania Avenue
Shillington, PA 19607
Kenneth C. Sandoe, Esquire
Steiner & Sandoe, Attorneys
36 West Main Avenue,
Myerstown, PA 17067
ESTATE OF ADAM WAGNER A/K/A ADAM D. WAGNER, late of the City of Lebanon, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executrix.
Judy M. Wagner, Executrix
Kevin M. Richards, Esquire
PO Box 1140
Lebanon, PA 17042-1140
ESTATE OF MELVIN E. HOFFER late of North Londonderry Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executrix.
Elaine P. Hoffer, Executrix
Kevin M. Richards, Esquire
PO Box 1140
Lebanon, PA 17042-1140
ESTATE OF JESSICA A. ROMANOFF, late of Union Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executor.
Michael P. Romanoff, Executor
12 Plymouth Drive
Jonestown, PA 17038
Frederick S. Long, Esquire
Long Brightbill
315 South Eighth Street
Lebanon, PA 17042
ESTATE OF RUTH E. KEENEY, late of Myerstown Borough, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executor.
Delmas L. Keeney, Executor
Jessica F. Greene, Esquire
Walters & Galloway, PLLC
54 East Main Street
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
ESTATE OF CARL G. GOOD, late of South Londonderry Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executor.
Jerry D. Good, Executor
Young and Young
44 South Main Street
PO Box 126
Manheim, PA 17545
SECOND PUBLICATION
ESTATE OF CARMEN L. FORNEY, late of North Londonderry Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executor.
Gary L. Forney, Executor
Gerald J. Brinser, Esquire
PO Box 323
Palmyra, PA 17078
ESTATE OF RICHARD LYNN HORST, late of Jackson Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters of Administration have been granted to the undersigned Administratrix.
Jeanne S. Miller, Administratrix
754 Stracks Dam Drive
Myerstown, PA 17067
Timothy T. Engler, Esquire
Steiner & Sandoe
36 West Main Avenue
Myerstown, PA 17067
ESTATE OF FRANK J. HARVATINE A.K.A. FRANK J. HARVATINE, JR., late of Cleona, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executrix.
Lisa K. H. Ingalls, Executrix
George W. Porter, Esquire
909 E. Chocolate Ave.
Hershey, PA 17033
ESTATE OF ROBERT E. MEYER, late of East Hanover Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executor.
Paul R. Meyer, Executor
Keith D. Wagner, Esquire
6 East Main Street-2nd Floor
P.O. Box 323
Palmyra, PA 17078-0323
ESTATE OF CARL S. MAURUS, late of North Lebanon Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Co-Executors.
Cheryl and Henry Maurus, Co-Executors
21 Deep Run Road
Myerstown, PA 17067
Timothy T. Engler, Esquire
Steiner & Sandoe
36 West Main Avenue
Myerstown, PA 17067
ESTATE OF MIRIAM A. RUNKLE, late of North Londonderry Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Co-Executors.
Charles E. Runkle, Co-Executor
Dennis J. Runkle, Co-Executor
Gerald J. Brinser, Esquire
PO Box 323
Palmyra, PA 17078
ESTATE OF RAY R. SATTAZAHN, late of the City of Lebanon, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Co-Executrices.
Phyllis S. Seyfert, Co-Executrix
1284 Mt. Zion Rd
Lebanon, PA 17046
Barbara M. Lentz, Co-Executrix
1179 Greble Rd
Lebanon PA, 17046
Kenneth C. Sandoe, Esquire
Steiner & Sandoe
36 West Main Avenue
Myerstown, PA 17067
ESTATE OF LARRY A. GODLEVSKI, late of Myerstown Borough, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executor.
Wayne A. Burggraff, Executor
Gerald J. Brinser, Esquire
PO Box 323
Palmyra PA, 17078
THIRD PUBLICATION
ESTATE OF RICHARD J. BATZ, late of Lebanon County Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Co-Executors.
Tammy Jo. Murphy, Co-Executrix
Michael R. Batz, Co-Executor
Anthony J. Fitzgibbons, Esquire
279 North Zinn’s Mill Road
Suite D
Lebanon, PA 17042
ESTATE OF IRWIN H. SIEGEL, late of South Lebanon Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executor.
Branch Banking and Trust Company, Executor
Estate of IRWIN H. SIEGEL
Reilly Wolfson Law Office
1601 Cornwall Road
Lebanon, PA 17042
ESTATE OF DAVID H. BARR, late of the City of Lebanon, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters of Administration have been granted to the undersigned Administratrix.
Melissa S. Strickler, Administratrix
Kevin M. Richards, Esquire
PO Box 1140
Lebanon, PA 17042-1140
ESTATE OF JEAN D. ASHBY, late of Heidelberg Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executrix.
Barbara Goux, Executrix
1635 E. Ocean Boulevard, #D5
Long Beach, CA 90802
John D. Enck, Esquire
Spitler, Kilgore & Enck, PC
522 South 8th Street
Lebanon, PA 17042
ESTATE OF ROBERT SWAVELY ADAMS, a/k/a ROBERT S. ADAMS, late of North Londonderry Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executrix.
Kathleen R. Scholl, Executrix
Daniel D. Hill, Esquire
Bellomo & Associates, LLC
3198 East Market Street
York, PA 17042
ESTATE OF KATHY JO WERT, late of Heidelberg Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executor.
Leonard P. Wert
1719 Old Rothsville Road
Lititz, PA 17543
Kenneth C. Sandoe, Esquire
Steiner & Sandoe
36 West Main Avenue
Myerstown, PA 17067
ESTATE OF RONALD S. ENGLE, JR., late of Palmyra Borough, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executrix.
Sandra L. Engle, Executrix
Gerald J. Brinser
Brinser Wagner
PO Box 323
Palmyra, PA 17078
ESTATE OF HATTIE M. MILLER, late of North Lebanon Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executrix.
Leah F. Kuhns, Executrix
5225 Wilson Lane, Apt 2112
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
Andrew J. Morrow, Esquire
Spitler, Kilgore & Enck, PC
522 S. 8th Street
Lebanon, PA 17042
ESTATE OF RAYMOND DAUGHERTY a/k/a RAYMOND F. DAUGHERTY, late of West Cornwall Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters Testamentary have been granted to the undersigned Executrix.
Susan Elaine Hays, Executrix
2625 Leslie Road
Mount Airy, MD 21771
Karl Kreiser, Esquire
552 Locust Street
Columbia, PA 17512
ESTATE OF CARL A. THIERWECHTER, SR., late of South Londonderry Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, deceased. Letters of Administration have been granted to the undersigned Administratrix.
Julie A. Heintzelman, Administratrix
Caleb J. Zimmerman, Esquire
Zimmerman Law Office
466 Jonestown Road
Jonestown, PA 17038
PETITION FOR LEAVE OF COURT
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the Jackson Township Board of Supervisors has filed a Petition for Leave of Court to sell Lot 107, Wheatland Manor, Jackson Township, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania. This filing can be viewed in the Lebanon County Orphans’ Court at Docket No. 2020-455
A hearing is scheduled for September 11, 2020 at 2:00 am in Courtroom 3 of the Lebanon County Courthouse located at 400 South 8th Street, Lebanon PA 17042. Any resident or group consisting of residents of the Township have the right to file a protest, and in the discretion of the Court may be heard individually or through counsel, or to intervene in such an action and be a party thereto. Secretary, Jackson Township
ORPHANS’ COURT DIVISION NOTICE
Notice is hereby given that the following accounts in decedents estates, guardianships and trusts have been filed in the Office of the Register of Wills and Clerk of Orphans’ Court of Lebanon County, and that the same will be presented of the Court of Common Pleas-Orphans’ Court Division of said County for confirmation NISI on
Tuesday, September 8, 2020
At 10:00 A.M.
in Courtroom No. 1, Municipal Building, City of Lebanon
FIRST AND FINAL ACCOUNTS WITH PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF DISTRIBUTION FILED BY EXECUTORS OR ADMINISTRATORS
- Giunta, Robert D., dec’d., James Cherry, Exr., Jason J. Schibinger, Atty.
- Buchter, Geraldine A., dec’d., Dennis A. Buchter & Raymond H. Buchter, Exrs., John E. Feather, Jr., Atty.
All of the aforesaid accounts and statements of Proposed Distribution will be confirmed ABSOLUTELY as of course by the said Orphans’ Court except those to which exemptions are filed within twenty (20) days after the same are confirmed NISI.
BRIAN CRAIG
REGISTER OF WILLS AND CLERK OF ORPHANS’ COURT
LEBANON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT LUZ MARIA RIVERA AND GABRIEL
JIMENEZ HAD A SON IN 2017, WHO WAS BORN IN LANCASTER COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA AND A SON IN 2018, WHO WAS BORN IN LEBANON COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA. A HEARING WILL BE HELD IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF LEBANON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IN COURTROOM NO. 4, BEFORE THE
HONORABLE CHARLES T. JONES, JR., JUDGE OF THE SEVERAL COURTS OF
LEBANON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ON THE 14 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2020 at
1:30 P.M. AT THE LEBANON COUNTY MUNICIPAL BUILDING, LOCATED AT 400
SOUTH EIGHTH STREET, LEBANON, PENNSYLVANIA ON THE THIRD FLOOR.
ALL PARENTAL RIGHTS OF THE FATHER TO THE CHILDREN SHALL BE
TERMINATED BY THE COURT ON THE DATE OF THE HEARING UNLESS THE
FATHER APPEARS AT THE HEARING FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBJECTING TO
TERMINATION OF HIS PARENTAL RIGHTS. THE FATHER MAY ALSO FILE A
WRITTEN OBJECTION OR DEFENSES, PERSONALLY OR BY ATTORNEY TO
SUCH TERMINATION WITH THE COURT PRIOR TO THE HEARING.
WRITTEN OBJECTIONS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF ORPHANS
COURT AT THE ORPHANS COURT OFFICE LOCATED AT THE LEBANON COUNTY
MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 400 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET, LEBANON, PENNSYLVANIA.
THE OBJECTIONS SHALL BE FILED IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS,
LEBANON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, ORPHANS COURT DIVISION – NO. 2020-
508.
ROBERTA J SANTIAGO, ESQUIRE
HENRY & BEAVER, LLP
937 WILLOW STREET
- O. BOX 1140
LEBANON, PA 17042
(717) 274-3644
JUDGES OPINION
Ray Simon v. Dennis Herman, et al., and Benny Torres, et al.
Civil Action-Law-Jurisdiction-Service of Original Process-Defects in Service of Process-Preliminary Objections-Actual Notice-Participation in Merits of Litigation
Nearly three (3) years ago, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendants after falling on or near property owned by Defendant Benny Torres (“Torres”). Torres has filed Preliminary Objections to the Complaint alleging that the Complaint filed almost three (3) years before never was served upon him despite the fact that Plaintiff was notified by the Sheriff of the address of his residence in November of 2016 and still has not effectuated service upon him.
- A civil case typically is commenced with the filing of a complaint setting forth factual allegations supporting a claim for relief, after which the defendant must be notified of the complaint through service of original process.
- If original process cannot be served upon a defendant within the timeframe set by law, a complaint must be reinstated until original process can be served.
- When a defendant has actual notice of litigation and participates in the merits of that litigation, the defendant can be deemed to have waived an objection to defective service.
- In light of the fact that Torres had actual knowledge of the Complaint since at least June of 2017 when he was advised by his insurance carrier of the Complaint, hired counsel, participated in discovery and waited until November of 2019 to lodge Preliminary Objections to the Complaint, the Court will prioritize substance over procedure to enable adjudication of the substantive dispute such that the Preliminary Objections will be overruled.
L.C.C.C.P. No. 2016-01656, Opinion by Bradford H. Charles, Judge, March 19, 2020.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEBANON COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION – LAW
RAY SIMON : No. 2016-01656
:
Plaintiff :
:
- :
:
DENNIS HERMAN, et al. :
:
BENNY TORRES, et al., :
Defendants :
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 2020, in accordance with the attached Opinion, the Preliminary Objections filed by Benny Torres are DENIED. Benny Torres is directed to file an answer to the Complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order.
A Status Conference is to be conducted in this case on May 4, 2020 at 1:30pm. The intent of the Court is to establish a case management scheduling order at the time of the Status Conference.
BY THE COURT:
______________________,J.
BRADFORD H. CHARLES
BHC/pmd
cc: Court Administration
Marc F. Greenfield, Esq. and Timothy J. Domis, Esq. // Two Penn Center Plaza, Suite 200, 1500 J.F.K. Blvd., Philadelphia PA 19102
Timothy J. Huber, Esq. // 515 W. Chestnut Street, Lancaster PA 17603
Alan S. Battisti, Esq.// One West Broad Street, Suite 700, Bethlehem PA 18018
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEBANON COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION – LAW
RAY SIMON : No. 2016-01656
:
Plaintiff :
:
- :
:
DENNIS HERMAN, et al. :
:
BENNY TORRES, et al., :
Defendants :
APPEARANCES:
Marc Greenfield, Esquire FOR PLAINTIFF
SPEAR, GREENFIELD, RICHMAN & WEITZ, P.C.
Timothy J. Huber, Esquire For DEFENDANT
BUZGON DAVIS LAW OFFICES Dennis Herman
Alan Battisti, Esquire For DEFENDANT
KING, SPRY, HERMAN, FREUND & FAUL, LLC Benny Torres
OPINION BY CHARLES, J., March 19, 2018
Today is a reprise – with twists – of an issue we adjudicated in the above-referenced case on February 16, 2018. We began that Opinion by stating: “Seldom has this jurist been less confident or more confused about a legal issue than he is by the one now before the Court.” If anything, the dispute now before this Court renders us even less confident and more confused. It is with this candid admission that we will undertake an analysis of the service-related issue that has been presented by the parties.
- FACTS
On November 19, 2019, Benny Torres (hereafter TORRES) filed preliminary objections to a complaint that had been filed almost three (3) years previously. The preliminary objections alleged that the complaint had never been served. Plaintiff Ray Simon (hereafter SIMON) filed a response to the preliminary objections in which he alleged, inter alia, that TORRES had been fully participating in the litigation by conducting discovery, etc. Because these claims were, to say the least, unusual, we scheduled a Factual Hearing to learn precisely what had occurred. That Factual Hearing occurred on January 23, 2020.
As a result of the Factual Hearing, we issued detailed findings of fact. Rather than summarize, we will simply recite all of the findings that we articulated in open court:
- Since approximately 2004, Defendant, Benny Torres, (hereinafter Torres) owned property located at 743 Church Street in the City of Lebanon.
- At the time Torres purchased the Lebanon County property, he was a resident of New York City. He remained a resident of New York City until March of 2013.
- In March of 2013, Torres moved to 2625 North 2nd Street, Philadelphia, PA. Torres notified Lebanon City authorities and all providers of utilities about his change of address. At no time did Torres hide or attempt to hide his address or his whereabouts from anyone.
- It is alleged that Plaintiff, Ray Simon, Jr., suffered a fall on February 5, 2015. The location of this fall occurred at or near the property on Church Street that is owned by Torres.
- On November 3, 2016, Ray Simon filed a civil complaint against Dennis Herman and Torres. The address for Torres contained in the civil complaint was 743 Church Street, Lebanon, PA 17046. At no time pertinent hereto, did Torres reside at that address.
- The Lebanon County Sheriff’s Department attempted to serve Torres without success. On November 17, 2016, the Sheriff issued a return of service that indicated that it could not locate Torres. However, the return of service form stated: “New address for Defendant is 2625 North 2nd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19133.” A copy of this return of service was provided to Plaintiff’s counsel shortly after November 17, 2016.
- Plaintiff reinstated his complaint on several occasions. Pertinent to the issue now before this Court is a reinstatement praecipe filed by Plaintiff on July 27, 2017. A copy of the reinstated complaint was sought to be served by Plaintiff upon Torres at 2625 North 2nd Street in the City of Philadelphia. Service was attempted on May 9, 2017, May 11, 2017, May 17, 2017, and May 23, 2017. At none of these times was Torres found to be at the 2625 North 2nd Street premises. On the last occasion a neighbor indicated to process servers that a family by the name of Agosto resided at the 2625 North 2nd Street property.
- Apparently Dennis Herman is insured by the same
insurance company that insures Torres. This insurance company received actual notice of the lawsuit against Torres by virtue of receiving documents that were served and directed to Dennis Herman. On June 1, 2017, counsel hired by the insurance company (Tuscarora Wayne Insurance Company) contacted Torres in order to advise him of this lawsuit. In or about the same timeframe, Torres had a direct communication with Plaintiff, Ray Simon, Jr., about the incident in question. As of June 2017, Torres had actual knowledge of the existence of the lawsuit filed against him.
- Counsel hired by Tuscarora Wayne Insurance Company now represents Torres. Discovery in the above‑referenced matter is ongoing. On November 5, 2019, a deposition of Ray Simon, Jr. was conducted at a law firm in Lancaster. During that deposition counsel for Torres asked numerous substantive questions of Mr. Simon regarding the incident in question.
- On November 19, 2019, Torres filed Preliminary Objections to the complaint based primarily upon the failure of Plaintiff to effectuate service. Torres filed a brief in support of those Preliminary Objections. The Plaintiff filed a response on December 12, 2019.
- At no time, up to and including today’s date, has Plaintiff served Torres with a copy of the complaint.
Because the facts presented at the January 23, 2020 hearing did not trigger any obvious conclusions, we solicited briefs from both sides. Those briefs have now been filed. The request of TORRES to dismiss the complaint based upon lack of service is now before this Court for disposition.
- LEGAL PRINCIPLES
Typically, a civil case is commenced with the filing of a complaint setting forth factual allegations that support a claim for relief. The next step in any civil case was, is and likely always will be to notify the defendant that a law suit has been filed through service of what has come to be known as “original process”. Specific rules have been promulgated to define how service of original process must be effectuated. See, Pa.R.C.P 400 Et. Seq.
In most situations, service of original process occurs quickly and easily. But how does the law respond to those inevitable scenarios where a defendant disappears either intentionally or fortuitously?
In law school, this jurist was taught that if original process could not be immediately served, the writ of summons would have to be re-issued or the complaint would have to be reinstated. We were taught time and again “If you fail to protect the record in this way, your client’s case will be dismissed and you will probably be sued for malpractice.” For most of Pennsylvania’s history, a fact pattern such as the one at bar would have been relatively easy to adjudicate; without reinstatement of a complaint until original process is served, the plaintiff’s cause of action would be dismissed.
As we outlined in our Opinion of February 16, 2018, the law in Pennsylvania regarding service of original process has changed dramatically since this jurist attended law school. In our Opinion, we used nine (9) pages to outline the evolution that has occurred in Pennsylvania law. We will not kill trees by repeating those changes. Rather, we will simply incorporate by reference what we wrote in our Opinion of February 16, 2018. It bears noting that we ended that Opinion by stating:
“…We are not completely confident about our conclusion…unfortunately, our research has not clearly revealed where the line in between excusable and inexcusable tardiness exists. For today, we will emphasize the lack of undue prejudice suffered by HERMAN and we will therefore err on the side of permitting the above-referenced case to continue.” (Slip opinion at page 13;emphasis supplied.)
To further complicate what is already complicated, there are Appellate cases that have applied the doctrine of waiver to defective service. Specifically, when a defendant has actual notice of litigation and participates in its merits, he/she can be deemed to have been waived an objection to defective service. See, Cathcart v. Keene Industrial Insulation, 471 A.2d 293 (Pa. Super. 1984).
This doctrine of waiver was applied in the recent case of Sharpe v. McQuiller, 206 A.3d 1179 (Pa. Super. 2019). In Sharpe, the Superior Court acknowledged that the rules governing service were not scrupulously followed. Nevertheless, because the defendant actively participated in the discovery process, the court deemed any objection to defects in service to have been waived; “The record supports the trial court’s finding that she waived any defects in service by participating in the merits of the law suit.” Id at page 1184. See also, O’Barto v. Glossers Stores Inc., 324 A. 2d 474 (Pa. Super. 1974) (“Once a party takes action on the merits of a case, he waives his right to object to defective service of process.”)
III. ANALYSIS
Whenever this Court is confronted with confusion over the state of the law, our go-to, fall-back position is to weigh the equities in an effort to discern what is and is not fair. Even that “go-to” analytical paradigm yields conflicting considerations in this case. Based upon all of the testimony presented in January, we cannot completely sympathize with the positions of either side.
With respect to SIMON, we cannot ignore or excuse the complete and utter failure to effectuate service of process. Even up until today. Even despite being given notice by the Sheriff of TORRES’ residence back in November of 2016. This is not simply a case where the rules have been technically violated. This is a case where the Plaintiff has turned his back upon a fundamental precept of due process – that every respondent must be given notice of the claim against him/her.
On the other hand, we cannot view TORRES as an innocent victim of an unscrupulous plaintiff who is seeking to extract monetary damages from an unsuspecting and unwitting defendant. Here, TORRES had actual knowledge of the lawsuit filed against him since at least June of 2017. Through his insurance company, TORRES hired a lawyer. He also participated in the discovery process. Moreover, he waited until November of 2019 to file preliminary objections challenging service of original process. Without question, TORRES acted in a way that could have lead a reasonable plaintiff to believe that defects in service would be overlooked.
Given that equity does not clearly favor either side in this dispute, and given the lack of any clear guiding legal precedent, how are we to adjudicate the issue now before this Court? The answer is…with difficulty and without confidence!
Ultimately, we will prioritize substance over procedure. We will err on the side of allowing a substantive dispute to be resolved on its merits as opposed to preventing those merits from being heard based upon defects of procedure. To be sure, the procedure that Plaintiff ignored implicates precepts such as notice that are fundamental to our system of justice. Still, we cannot ignore the fact that TORRES, or his legal representatives, had actual knowledge of this lawsuit and participated substantively in it. In the end, it is this actual notice and participation that will cause us to rule in favor of SIMON.
We will enter an Order today to DENY the Preliminary Objections filed by TORRES. We will require TORRES to file a formal answer to the Complaint so that the above-referenced matter can proceed on its merits. In addition, we will sua esponte schedule a Status Conference so that scheduling deadlines can be imposed. This case is now more than three (3) years old and a case management plan must be developed.